<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>WhatsAPundit</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2008:/whatsapundit/3</id>
   <updated>2008-04-16T22:53:43Z</updated>
   <subtitle>Because opinion is the new opiate of the masses</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Won&apos;t Get Fooled again</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2008/04/wont_get_fooled_again.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2008:/whatsapundit//3.136</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-16T21:59:16Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-16T22:53:43Z</updated>
   
   <summary>There&apos;s are words for a person who will say anything to any crowd, as long as that person thinks the crowds don&apos;t overlap. Inspirational ain&apos;t in the list. Neither are &quot;ethical&quot;, &quot;reliable&quot;, &quot;honest&quot;, etc. For that matter, in the modern world where cell phones can shoot video and little old sycophantic ladies have blogs, &quot;smart&quot; can no longer be applied either.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Presidency &apos;08" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="177" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p><em>"I'm asking you to believe. Not just in my ability to bring about real change in Washington ... I'm asking you to believe in yours."</em></p>

<p>&mdash; The banner quote at Barak Obama's <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/index.php" target="itschinatownjake">official campaign site</a>. 

<p>There are a lot of people who would love to find a politician they can believe in, who truly cares more about principle than <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality" target="wikipedia">principality</a>. A lot of those people are <a href="http://ohprettylady.blogspot.com/" target="pretty_lady">sharp and sophisticated</a>. But Barak just isn't the guy they should buy into.</p>

<p>For what it's worth, I thought when the controversy broke over Obama's long-term pastor the not-quite-right Reverend Wright that it was more a sign of a politician not knowing when to ditch a problematic association than a sign of fealty to <em>anything</em> coming from that pulpit. Being a member of that church gave Obama credibility with his early constituency, and I always assumed it was simply cold calculation that put Barak in those pews.</p>

<p>Nothing I've heard since makes me think any differently.</p>

<p>Still, I liked Obama. He struck me as a smart, articulate political operator who might actually shake things up in Washington. His down-the-line progressive/liberal voting record didn't bother me too much because frankly the Presidency isn't really an Imperial office, and the amount of damage he could do in setting policy from above would be severely limited by his ability to move things (or not) through Congress.</p>

<p>I <em>believe</em> in gridlock, and think it a good thing.</p>

<p>What Obama brought (I thought) was an outsider's perspective to the whole game, impressive native intelligence, and a truckload of charisma. The Obamanicas were not a bug in my mind (unlike the troglodytes who were trolling for Ron Paul) but a feature; the office of the Presidency may not be Imperial, but it is certainly show biz, and both Reagan and Clinton did good by forcing people to respect the position even if they disagreed with the current occupant.</p>

<p>A pair of bookend incidents has changed my mind.</p>

<p>First, something that made a stir, but didn't change the game much. An Obama advisor apparently <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=293120" target="_blank">back-channeled to Canada that Obama wasn't serious about screwing around with NAFTA.</a> A lot of explanations were tossed out by the Obama campaign, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN0338038720080303" target="_blank">Canada tried to make nice-nice</a>, and for the most part it had been forgotten. 

<p>Then the Wright controversy comes along, and Barak's "brilliant" speech explaining why it's okay for some people to preach "God Damn America" because you know they don't really mean it. Or something. And those who do have some history, you dig?</p>

<p>That speech was Obama's biggest blunder up until now. A non-apology apology is almost always worse than saying nothing at all, even if the press reports are loudly effusive though a bit muffled because the reporters are so deeply into kissing tuchus. The love goes away. The quotes don't.</p> 

<p>Then comes <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/obama-no-surprise-that-ha_b_96188.html" target="huffpo">Bitter Gate</a>. Or Cling Gate. Whatever you want to call it. Have to repeat the quote:</p>

<blockquote>"You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them," Obama said. "And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."</blockquote>

<p>That's pretty breathtaking. Not since college has someone been more up-front in calling me and my family  not-too-smart, morally damaged, pathetic god-bothering gun-loving rednecks.</p>

<p>So yeah, my estimates of Barak's native intelligence took a nosedive, considering a big win in Pennsylvania keeps Hillary! in the race, and that the quote is going to lose a <i>lot</i> of states for Obama in November, assuming he actually gets there.</p>

<p>But then I read this little factoid from Bill Bradley at Pajamas Media:</p>

<blockquote>And from the standpoint of Obama campaign figures, the material was gotten under false pretenses. One top Obama hand speaks of the campaign and candidate being blindsided. Fowler was a supporter, a contributor, an activist, a blogger, not a reporter. <em>With the event closed to the press</em>, Obama spoke with less care than he would have otherwise had he known a reporter, of any sort, was in attendance. [Emphasis added.]</blockquote>

<p>Everybody has been talking like Obama "misspoke". Obama claims it <a href="http://www.alternet.org/election08/82366/">himself</a>. Excuse me, no. He was speaking to ultra-rich San Franciscans from whom he wished to raise money. It was a "Save the Whales" speech, only instead of large marine mammals, Obama wanted these patrons to contribute to the salvation of the Great White Rednecks. Which obviously contribute less to the cultural zeitgeist than do humpback whales, but one must respect all of Gaia's creatures, no matter how vile.</p>

<p>There's are words for a person who will say anything to any crowd, as long as that person thinks the crowds don't overlap. <em>Inspirational</em> ain't in the list. Neither are "ethical", "reliable", "honest", etc. For that matter, in the modern world where cell phones can shoot video and little old sycophantic ladies have blogs, "smart" can no longer be applied either.</p>

<p>So maybe Obama can still bring show-biz glamour to the Office of the Presidency. I don't know; I honestly don't think he can get there now, considering he's bitch-slapped most of middle America. I just feel sorry for the folks who can't let go of the dream of a politician who isn't a Grade A Bastard.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Perfect Storm</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2008/03/the_perfect_storm.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2008:/whatsapundit//3.134</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-26T22:24:25Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-26T23:07:05Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Well, the Democratic Primary race has become a choice between a candidate for whom 50% of the electorate wouldn&apos;t vote if Malcolm X were the only other choice, and Malcolm X.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Presidency &apos;08" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="175" label="Hillary" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="173" label="McCain" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="177" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p>At the beginning of this Election Cycle (i.e. when the last poll closed in each district on < a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_general_elections,_2006" target="next">November 7, 2006</a>), I wouldn't have given much of a chance that any Republican other than Giuliani could be elected President in 2008. And when Rudy (and Fred Thompson, once he started floating the idea) both flamed out, I figured whoever did win (McCain, Romney, or Huckabee) was toast.</p>

<p>Well.</p>

<p>What I've always figured was Hillary! would win a squeaker. Nothing on the Republican side to inspire any but the base to get out and vote. Most of the rest of the <a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/hillary_clinton_favorableunfav.php" target="polls">50% who wouldn't vote for her even if Malcolm X was the only other choice</a> would just sit it out. She'd get her base plus Independents who liked the idea of a competent woman as President and voila, a low turnout and another co-Presidency.</p>

<p>Well, the Democratic Primary race has become a choice between a candidate for whom 50% of the electorate wouldn't vote if Malcolm X were the only other choice, and <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/13390609/campaign_08_the_radical_roots_of_barack_obama/3" target="malcolm">Malcolm X.</a></p>

<p>Yes, that's unfair to Obama, but he did worse than whiff badly at a great opportunity to hit one out of the park. (He could have fundamentally changed American politics by defining exactly how he differed from the old racialist politics of Sharpton et. al.) Instead he hit a monster pop-up that let people see exactly <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Vote2008/story?id=4473696" target="blahblah">how much sympathy and respect he had for the racialists</a>, and how <a href="http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/03/18/obama-seeks-to-stop-wright-coverage-loop/" target="blahblahblah">little he was willing to do</a> to actually change anything.</p>

<p>So the mainstream media is chanting "back back back" while the outfield, second baseman, and short stop (blogs, Hillary!, and McCain) are camped underneath in short centerfield. Somebody's going to field that airball (most likely Hillary!, in the form of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/13/jeremiah-wright-obamas-_n_91312.html" target="oh_that_will_work_rev">finessing the delegates</a> at the Democratic National Convention) and Mighty Obama will be out.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, the only real thing Clinton had going for her was her air of inevitability, and the associated assumption of competence, Well, kiss that goodbye, and say hello to all the reminders of exactly why so many people dislike her so thoroughly.</p>

<p>My predicting ability has been lousy re: the Republican primaries, so I'm not as confident in this prediction as I might have been hadn't I been so far in the tank for Rudy, but I don't see how McCain loses in November.</p>

<p>Assuming, of course, he makes it that far. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/01/david-lettermans-oldman_n_89237.html" target="geritol">Damn, the man looks <i>old</i></a>. Nothing wrong with that (Reagan was no spring chicken when he took office, and he made it through eight years, but then again, he didn't spend time in the Hanoi Hilton) but the Presidency is a hard, hard job. McCain's VP pick is going to be very, very important. (And if it's Huckabee, I'll vote for either Malcolm X or the Shrew.)</p>

<p>Gah, what options.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Citizen Spitzer</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2008/03/citizen_spitzer.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2008:/whatsapundit//3.131</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-12T15:53:04Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-12T16:03:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary>It would take an Orson Wells to make a movie that would do justice to the Eliot Spitzer saga. If any of the Spitzer daughters are reading this, please stop now....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Progressive Degeneration" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p>It would take an Orson Wells to make a movie that would do justice to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/11/nyregion/11fall.html?ex=1362888000&en=3b1aa506e8decb36&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all">Eliot Spitzer saga</a>. </p>

<p>If any of the Spitzer daughters are reading this, please stop now. </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Fisch is right:</p>

<blockquote>Plus, sometimes an act like this, where someone risks such huge amounts for something so foolish, has to be looked at as a sickness. Seriously, he must have had some sort of sex addiction to be begging dirty prostitutes to have bareback sex with him. He is a sick man. That doesn't mean he isn't guilty, but maybe somewhere deep down, his wife recognizes this.</blockquote>

<p>From the comments at <a href="http://www.alarmingnews.com/archives/007050.html">Alarming News: Who are these women?</a></p>

<p>There is a sickness obvious in Spitzer, but it isn't so much sex addiction as power addiction. (I'm not huge on the sex=power equivalence, but here it works, I think.) 

</p><p>I mean, Spitzer made at least part of his reputation by putting prostitutes in jail. Any bets on whether or not banging a girl he could put in the slammer was part of the attraction for him?

</p><p>And of course, part of real power is being able to say screw the rules whenever it suits your own id's needs.

</p><p>And to continue the theme, how powerful must it have felt to have his wife stand by him like a good dog while the rest of the world reviled him? He can't throw her in jail, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/12/nyregion/12silda.html?ex=1362974400&en=78f14f2fc64a9c8d&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all">but at least he could throw her to the wolves</a>. He probably wanted to have hot make-up sex right after that news conference. 

</p><p>Spitzer is an example of the worst that are attracted to politics, and how political power can make a bad man into a monster. Were he smarter, he might have had a chance to be be President someday. 

</p><p>Now there's a cautionary thought for you.</p> ]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Muddled</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2008/03/muddled.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2008:/whatsapundit//3.130</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-06T13:00:45Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-06T13:16:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>On the other hand, both of them strike me as less stupid than a bucket of bricks, so the Democrats will be fielding their best challenger since 1992, one way or the other. </summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Presidency &apos;08" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Me, not the PhantomWife, with whom I had a rare political conversation this morning.

</p><p>No, the Presidential race this year is muddled. I mean, forget that my fourth favorite Republican is going to be the nominee. (The first three were Rudy, Fred Thompson, and Romney in that order.) 

</p><p>On the Democrats side it will be either the Screecher or the Holey Man. 

</p><p>I mean, with Obama, there really doesn't seem to be any there there, other than naked ambition and the willingness to say something with utter conviction to one crowd while <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=obama+nafta+canada&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official" target="backchannel">backchannelling</a> to the Good Old Boys that it's just talk. 

</p><p>And then there's Hillary, and I just totally lost what the difference would be.....

</p><p>Oh, wait, the difference would be that she's putatively heard Bill talking in his sleep, and she took notes or something, so she's at least taken the Presidency 101 course vicariously. Obama didn't even CLEP it. 

</p><p>Whatever.

</p><p>So to Karol's commenter <a href="http://www.alarmingnews.com/archives/007030.html#comments" target="alarming">Shawn</a> who said...
</p>
<blockquote>Just you? I'm seeing a clash between politics as usual and a new politics based on hopeful change.</blockquote>

<p>...I would recommend he listen real close to the lyrics to <a href="http://www.lyricsfreak.com/w/who/baba+oriley_20146822.html" target="baba">Baba O'Riley</a> before getting too invested in the hopeful change thing. Especially if the agent of said change happens to have cut his teeth in <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2lrmuh" target="concretesneakers">Chicago politics</a>.

</p><p>I mean, jeeeezus. How gullible can an electorate get?

</p><p>On the other hand, both of them strike me as less stupid than a bucket of bricks, so the Democrats will be fielding their best challenger since 1992, one way or the other. 

</p><p>So I guess this is a better-than-average cycle for this Republic, heaven help us.</p> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Well, D&apos;uh</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2008/02/well_duh.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2008:/whatsapundit//3.128</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-27T17:58:43Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-27T18:03:09Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Sharks Decline But Attacks Rise A diver who suffered a fatal shark bite in the Bahamas this week is part of a trend of increasing attacks around the world despite plummeting populations of the majestic fish. If sharks are...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://mark.poling.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Fun stuff" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="129" label="News of the Weird" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20080227/sc_livescience/sharksdeclinebutattacksrise"> Sharks Decline But Attacks Rise</a></p>

<blockquote>A diver who suffered a fatal shark bite in the Bahamas this week is part of a trend of increasing attacks around the world despite plummeting populations of the majestic fish.<br />
<br />
If sharks are so threatened in the world's waters, why are attacks on humans on the rise?</blockquote>

<p>Well, it could be because they're <em>pissed off</em>...</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Tao of Ron</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2008/01/the_tao_of_ron.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2008:/whatsapundit//3.125</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-11T22:18:54Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-11T22:41:57Z</updated>
   
   <summary>What you don&apos;t get is much in the way of traction with the 99.9% who, when confronted by some really odoriferous statements and views, tend to tune the loon out.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Presidency &apos;08" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="168" label="Ron Paul" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p>If you excite .1% (which I think you'll agree is a tiny fraction) of the eligible voters in the United States, you've tapped into the resources of 220,000 people. If a significant fraction of those are technologically sophisticated (forget their ability to function in society otherwise) you get a mighty strong presence in this intertube thingy. Hence the perpetually skewed internet polls.</p>

<p><What is the sound of one hand clicking? All the <a href="http://ronulan.com/">Ronulans</a> screwing up the <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/strawpoll2008/results.php?precinctid=d7b93ad39dd2b3ab00924ee074aabdd3a">Pajama Media polls</a>.)</p>

<p>What you don't get is much in the way of traction with the 99.9% who, when confronted by some really <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1835179/posts">odoriferous</a> <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/mason/5445666.html">statements</a> and <a href="http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2006/cr021506.htm">views</a>, tend to tune the loon out.</p>

<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul">Ron Paul</a> has gotten attention from old media because he's this cycle's Republican Freak. (Remember <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Robertson">Pat Robertson</a>? How about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Buchanan">Pat Buchanan</a>?) The fact that he's also drawn the support of members of the population who each know at least four words of Klingon and aren't afraid to use them, just adds spice to the dish.<p> 

<p>(Or sauce for the goose, as Spock might say.)</p>

<p><strong>Note:</strong> I left the original version of this post as a comment on <a href="http://www.rogerlsimon.com/mt-archives/2008/01/ron_paul_one_mo.php">Roger L. Simon's blog</a>. I've edited it a bit, but not much.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>&apos;Tis the season</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2008/01/tis_the_season.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2008:/whatsapundit//3.124</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-10T12:01:58Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-10T13:42:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary>...to catch nasty colds. Liz had one for New Years. It hit me and the kids a few days later. Monday and Tuesday nights I was sick as a dog (have no idea why the nights were worse than the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Fatherhood" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p>...to catch nasty colds.</p>

<p>Liz had one for New Years. It hit me and the kids a few days later. Monday and Tuesday nights I was sick as a dog (have no idea why the nights were worse than the days, but they were) and the babies spiked little fevers (like 100.5) off-and-on over the same period.</p>

<p>Meh.</p>

<p>Anyway, yesterday was better, except for the babies' <a href="http://www.synagis.com/" target="_blank">Synagis</a> shots. RSV is bad news for babies, especially premies, but let me tell you, the shots aren't any walks in the park either, at least from a decibel perspective.</p>
<p>The doctor says they're too young to have memories of experiences a month apart, but I'm convinced Hunter <i>knows</i> the pediatrician's office. As soon as we were in the examination room and I started undressing her, she went into total I'm&ndash;mad&ndash;as&ndash;hell&ndash;and&ndash;I'm&ndash;not&ndash;going&ndash;to&ndash;take&ndash; it&ndash;anymore meltdown mode. This continued for the entire hour and a half that we were there.</p>

<p>No fun.</p>

<p>Anyway, a picture for you (click for a glorious expansion):</p>

<p><a href="http://www.gojou.net/family/20080109/Hunter_lunchtime.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.gojou.net/family/20080109/Hunter_lunchtime.html','popup','width=600,height=800,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.gojou.net/family/20080109/Hunter_lunchtime-thumb.jpg" width="120" height="160" alt="" /></a></p>

<p>Hunter can be a bit fussy about eating. She has this habit of pulling the old ninja slap-the-sword-out-of-line trick when the bottle or the spoon is coming toward her mouth, pretty much randomly. I was trying to feed her solid food while she was in her buzzy seat (she'd earler decided she didn't want to eat in her high chair) when she slapped not only the spoon, but the whole two-sided bowl containing rice cereal in one half, sweet potatoes in the other, out of my hand and onto her lap.</p>

<p>As you can see from the picture, <i>that</i> she considered fun. </p>
<hr />
<p>Yes, it has been a long time between posts. With the political season heating up, and with it turning into such an <i>interesting</i> political season, posts may  be a much more regular occurrence</a>.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>9/11, Six Years Later</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2007/09/911_six_years_later.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2007:/whatsapundit//3.111</id>
   
   <published>2007-09-11T22:16:09Z</published>
   <updated>2007-09-11T22:17:00Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Taking Pictures....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Fatherhood" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Personal Notes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Twins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="152" label="Twins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ashidome.typepad.com/housearrest/2007/09/taking-pictures.html" target="ashidome">Taking Pictures.</a></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Brilliant</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2007/08/brilliant.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2007:/whatsapundit//3.108</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-24T10:19:14Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-24T10:20:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A classic Ish comment....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[A <a href="http://triptronix.net/ishbadiddle/archives/2007/08/22/16.39.04/#reply20070823170125" target="ish">classic Ish comment</a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Down the line</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2007/08/down_the_line.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2007:/whatsapundit//3.107</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-06T13:26:45Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-06T13:29:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary>As far as I know it still does, but I wouldn&apos;t bet on it doing so for much longer. Which is a shame, because I would like to take my family back to West Virginia on that train some time. It was a beautiful way to travel.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Fatherhood" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="152" label="Twins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<blockquote>Good morning America how are you?<br />
Don't you know me I'm your native son,<br />
I'm the train they call The City of New Orleans,<br />
I'll be gone five hundred miles when the day is done.</blockquote>

<p>Today is the first day I stay home with our children alone.</p>

<p>Liz just left for work. She got me up from my too-short nap (I foolishly read the latest Harry Potter for an hour) at 6:30, and both babies went off as soon as she left the room to shower. So instead of drowsing for another half hour or so, it was fuss and feed and change from the get go.</p>

<p>The most either Hunter or Aden sleep at a time is about four hours. Our routine is for me to stay up for them from 10:00 in the evening until 4:00 in the morning so Liz can sleep enough to be coherent during the day. Then I sleep for a couple of hours, get back up, and care for them through the day, then sleep for another three hours after Liz gets home.  With luck I'll be able to nap off and on during the day. </p>

<p>So until the twins actually can sleep in the night, I will be one sleep-deprived mofo.</p> 

<p>Anyway, after her bottle and having her diaper changed, Hunter has settled right down, dozing in her boppie pillow. Aden on the other hand is wide awake and having none of this quiet-time shit. So he's strapped to my chest in a Baby Bjorn, which in general he thinks is the Best Thing Ever.</p>

<p>And just to do something, I start singing to him:</p>

<blockquote>Nighttime on The City of New Orleans,<br />
Changing cars in Memphis, Tennessee.<br />
Half way home, we'll be there by morning<br />
Through the Mississippi darkness<br />
Rolling down to the sea.<br />
And all the towns and people seem<br />
To fade into a bad dream<br />
And the steel rails still ain't heard the news.<br />
The conductor sings his song again,<br />
The passengers will please refrain<br />
This train's got the disappearing railroad blues.</blockquote>

<p>Way back in the early 80's I would occasionally take the train between Charleston WV and Baltimore where I was going to school. It was one of those old-style trains, with the ancient leather seats with an amazing amount of legroom. That train was called the Cardinal, apparently because the Cardinal is the state bird of most of the states the train ran through. As I recall it ran from Chicago to Boston, taking a leisurely, scenic loop in the process. Hence the stop in Charleston.</p>

<p>As far as I know it still does, but I wouldn't bet on it doing so for much longer. Which is a shame, because I would like to take my family back to West Virginia on that train some time. It was a beautiful way to travel.</p>

<p>But now I have a son and he's curled on my chest, and I am singing to him about trains, and I'm remembering being young in a time that was already really past the time of trains, but riding a comfortable old dinosaur into a future I would have no presentiment of whatsoever, and thinking how lucky I was, have been and am.</p>

<p>And I started crying for the first time since they were born.</p>

<p>Life is good.</p>

<blockquote>Good night, America, how are you?<br />
Don't you know me I'm your native son,<br />
I'm the train they call The City of New Orleans,<br />
I'll be gone five hundred miles when the day is done.</blockquote>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Growing Growing Growing</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2007/05/growing_growing_growing.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2007:/whatsapundit//3.97</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-18T02:40:44Z</published>
   <updated>2007-05-18T02:57:34Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Good news: Aden gained a total of 14 ounces over the last 20 days, and his umbilical blood flows, while still a little stressed today, are acceptable, so the babies get to stay in the mom until Wednesday. The details:...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Twins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="149" label="Hospital" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="105" label="Ultrasounds" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Good news: Aden gained a total of 14 ounces over the last 20 days, and his umbilical blood flows, while still a little stressed today, are acceptable, so the babies get to stay in the mom until Wednesday.</p>

<p>The details: Hunter weighs in at an (estimated) 5 pounds, 3 ounces, while Aden tips the virtual scales at 3 pounds, 3 ounces. Both are active and besides for Aden's noted issues, seem happy and healthy.</p>

]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday they found a private room for Liz, and she's settling in nicely:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/liz_settled.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/liz_settled.html','popup','width=800,height=600,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false">
<img alt="liz_settled_detail.png" src="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/liz_settled_detail.png" width="180" height="110" /></a></p>
<p>(Click on the image for a panorama of Liz' home-away-from-home.)</p>
<p>So the routine will be for the nurses to monitor the babies twice a day, with another Doppler study scheduled for Monday.  If everything goes smoothly and the babies keep kicking the stuffing out of Liz, they will <b>defininitely</b> be delivered by C-section on Wednesday. At the first indication of danger to Hunter, Aden, or Liz, they'll do the C-section immediately.</p>
<p>So at the latest, we're talking about being parents by Wednesday.</p>
<p>Now, more pictures.</p>
<p>Hunter has been good about <a href="http://ashidome.typepad.com/housearrest/2007/04/pictures.html">giving us good pictures</a>.  She's been above and in front pretty much the whole time, so her images have tended to be less "fuzzy" than Aden's. Plus, the kid moves a lot. Well, here's the latest of Aden:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/aden_0517.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/aden_0517.html','popup','width=800,height=600,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img alt="aden_0517-thumbnail.png" src="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/aden_0517-thumbnail.png" width="180" height="135" />
</a></p>
<p>Still not great, but mostly because of the angle.  Here's a detail, rotated:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/aden_closeup.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/aden_closeup.html','popup','width=800,height=600,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img alt="aden_closeup-thumbnail.png" src="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/aden_closeup-thumbnail.png" width="180" height="135" /></a>
</p>
<p>He's going to be not only a rogue (inferred from all the consternation he's delivered so far) but a handsome rogue to boot.</p>
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Twins on the way?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2007/05/twins_on_the_way.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2007:/whatsapundit//3.95</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-15T03:05:37Z</published>
   <updated>2007-05-15T03:11:51Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Who can say? But until then, below the fold is a picture of Liz in the ante-partum ward of Columbia Presbyterian........</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Who can say?  But until then, below the fold is a picture of Liz in the ante-partum ward of Columbia Presbyterian.....</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/in_ante-partum.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/in_ante-partum.html','popup','width=800,height=600,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img alt="in_ante-partum_thumbnail.jpg" src="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/in_ante-partum_thumbnail.jpg" width="360" height="270" /></a></p>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Bed Rest</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2007/04/bed_rest.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2007:/whatsapundit//3.92</id>
   
   <published>2007-04-25T17:02:39Z</published>
   <updated>2007-04-25T17:15:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Session Start (whatsapundit:ashidome): Wed Apr 25 10:25:02 2007 [11:47] ashidome: I need to go on bedrest [11:47] whatsapundit: thought so [11:47] whatsapundit: okay, what does that mean [11:47] whatsapundit: hmmmm. [11:47] ashidome: And come twice a week to check the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="BLIMs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Personal Notes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Twins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="126" label="pregnancy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="118" label="Worry" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p><strong>Session Start (<font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>:<a href="http://ashidome.typepad.com" target="ashidome"><font color="#ff0000">ashidome</font></a>): Wed Apr 25 10:25:02 2007</strong></p>
</p><p>[11:47] <font color="#ff0000">ashidome</font>: I need to go on <a href="http://www.kidshealth.org/parent/pregnancy_newborn/pregnancy/bed_rest.html" target="bedrest">bedrest</a>
</p><p>[11:47] <font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>: thought so
</p><p>[11:47] <font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>: okay, what does that mean
</p><p>[11:47] <font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>: hmmmm.
</p><p>[11:47] <font color="#ff0000">ashidome</font>: And come twice a week to check the babies
</p><p>[11:47] <font color="#ff0000">ashidome</font>: Still at the appointment
</p><p>[11:47] <font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>: okay
</p><p>[11:47] <font color="#ff0000">ashidome</font>: Gotta go on disability for work
</p><p>[11:48] <font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>: can you work from home?
</p><p>[11:48] <font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>: or is this really "bedrest"
</p><p>[11:48] <font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>: and not just rest
</p><p>[11:49] <font color="#ff0000">ashidome</font>: Its greatly decreased activity
</p><p>[11:49] <font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>: okay
</p><p>[11:49] <font color="#ff0000">ashidome</font>: Watching tv
</p><p>[11:49] <font color="#ff0000">ashidome</font>: Lying in bed
</p><p>[11:49] <font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>: knitting
</p><p>[11:49] <font color="#ff0000">ashidome</font>: Yeah
</p><p>[11:49] <font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>: okay, we can do this
</p><p>[11:49] <font color="#ff0000">ashidome</font>: Some computer time but should be done in bed
</p><p>[11:49] <font color="#ff0000">ashidome</font>: I'm getting more details
</p><p>[11:50] <font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>: we have the old laptop and a bedtray, that works
</p><p>[11:50] <font color="#0000ff">whatsapundit</font>: assuming you can sit up in bed</p>
<br />
<hr />
<br />
<p>In a way, this news is a relief.  I've been worried that Liz was trying to be Superwoman, and maybe this will allow her to accept some help / let go of some stuff.  </p>
<p>The problem though is one of the twins isn't doing nearly as well as the other.  Today's weigh-in has Hunter at 3 lb 12 oz, Aden at 2 lbs 5 oz.</p>
<p>Damn, my stomach hurts.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Muck</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2007/04/muck.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2007:/whatsapundit//3.90</id>
   
   <published>2007-04-16T16:38:23Z</published>
   <updated>2007-04-23T14:47:36Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Session Start (whatsapundit:ashidome): Mon Apr 16 10:25:02 2007 [10:25] whatsapundit: just heard a rumor that &lt;REDACTED&gt; resigned [10:25] whatsapundit: from a source that I trust [10:25] ashidome: Okay... [10:26] ashidome: That blows [10:26] whatsapundit: yep [10:26] whatsapundit: very very bad...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="BLIMs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Personal Notes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="144" label="Work" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="118" label="Worry" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p><strong>Session Start (<font color="red">whatsapundit</font>:<a href="http://ashidome.typepad.com" target="ashidome"><font color="blue">ashidome</font></a>): Mon Apr 16 10:25:02 2007</strong></p>
<p>[10:25] <font color="red">whatsapundit</font>: just heard a rumor that &lt;REDACTED&gt; resigned</p>
<p>[10:25] <font color="red">whatsapundit</font>: from a source that I trust</p>
<p>[10:25] <font color="blue">ashidome</font>: Okay...</p>
<p>[10:26] <font color="blue">ashidome</font>: That blows</p>
<p>[10:26] <font color="red">whatsapundit</font>: yep</p>
<p>[10:26] <font color="red">whatsapundit</font>: very very bad sign</p>
<p>[10:29] <font color="blue">ashidome</font>: Oh I thought not paying people was very very bad on its own</p>
<p>[10:29] <font color="red">whatsapundit</font>: we've got so many scary signs we look like an australian beach</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Single-Issue Voters --&gt; Non-Winning Candidates</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2007/04/singleissue_voters_nonwinning.html" />
   <id>tag:www.gojou.net,2007:/whatsapundit//3.87</id>
   
   <published>2007-04-10T14:36:51Z</published>
   <updated>2007-04-23T14:48:18Z</updated>
   
   <summary>So, instead we get organized intimidation of Presidential candidates on an issue that most people put down around 10 or 12 on their priority list.  You&apos;re perfectly within you&apos;re rights to say most people are moral retards, but that&apos;s definitely not the way to win elections.  So say hello to President Hillary! in 2008 for me, will you? </summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Poling</name>
      <uri>http://gojou.net/whatsapundit</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Stupid Pachyderm Tricks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/">
      <![CDATA[<p>I love me some single-issue voters.  <i>Not!</i></p>
<p>Okay, this should have been continued over at <a href="http://www.alarmingnews.com/archives/005913.html">Alarming News</a>, but the comment section broke down at a response to a point I raised, and since I think it's an important point, I am re-publishing the last two comments followed by my rebuttal over here.</p>
<br />
<hr />
<p>myrna, Rudy has said he would appoint strict constructionists to the Court. Do you think he's lying? (Yeah, I know the rap that the judges he appointed in NYC "leaned left", but consider the talent pool he had available, please.)</p>

<p>And as an aside, the <a href="http://www.gojou.net/whatsapundit/2007/04/on_cicular_firingsquads.html" target="mememe">fetishization of abortion</a> is one of the reasons I refuse to call myself a Republican. (The flip side is the fetishization of abortion is one of the reasons I refuse to call myself a Democrat, too...)</p>

<p>Everyone keeps trying to resurrect Reagan. Well someone tell me exactly what the Gipper did to fight the wave of abortions sweeping the land in the 1980s.</p>

<p>Anyone?</p>

<p>It's a wonder there's been any children born at all in this country since Roe v. Wade.<br />
Posted by: <a href="mailto:whatsapundit@gojou.net">Mark Poling</a> at April 9, 2007 02:03 PM</p>
<hr />
<p>Well Mark, you can worry about the 'fetishization' of the abortion issue, and I'll worry about its 'trivialization'.</p>

<p>I wonder how a person who supports Roe v. Wade can be taken seriously when he says he will appoint strict constuctionist justices. Aside from overturning Roe, there are a number of ways a President's politics can affect abortion policy - parental notification, partial birth, etc.<br />Posted by: <a href="http://pantrydawg.blogspot.com">myra langerhas</a> at April 9, 2007 03:02 PM </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<hr />
<p>Begin original content....</p>
<p>Until Roe is overturned, it is the law of the land; that's what the Constitution says, and if there is one thing Rudy is it is a stickler for the law.  Rudy didn't say <i>he</i> was a strict constructionist, he said he would appoint strict-constructionists to the bench.  A subtle distinction, but I think an honest one.</p>

<p>There is of course a way to overturn Roe that doesn't require holding the Republican Party hostage; get organized and  a Constitutional Amendment passed protecting the rights of the unborn.  Or even federal laws that <i>explicitly</i> define what is and is not legal.  And then let the Court decide the Constitutionality of those laws.</p>

<p>But the problem with that of course is someone on the other side might also get around to trying to draft real laws coming from the other side, and the REAL problem is the single-issue voters on both sides know that most Americans are somewhere in the middle on the issues.  And something tells me that a federal law (or Constitutional Amendment) that allowed abortions through the 20th week wouldn't meet with your personal approval (or, to be fair, with the approval of NOW either) even though most Americans would be satisfied with it as a compromise solution.</p>

<p>So, instead we get organized intimidation of Presidential candidates on an issue that most people put down around 10 or 12 on their priority list.  You're perfectly within you're rights to say most people are moral retards, but that's definitely not the way to win elections.  So say hello to President Hillary! in 2008 for me, will you?</p> 

<p>(Clinton, slime snake that he was, hit the perfect pitch with his "Safe, legal, and rare" construction.  To quote a <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/tomsnyder/hg-1-32.html" target="hhg2h">wise rodent</a>, "Sounds very significant without actually tying you down to meaning anything at all."  That was our boy Bill.)</p>

<p>Myrna, I'm sympathetic to your cause, believe it or not.  You mention partial birth abortion (definitely against it) and parental notification laws (definitely for it, but if anyone who has a personal need it as a parent has f**ked up).  If you're asking for real-world solutions to specific cases, I'm all for it.  If you're demanding that the candidate start by promising to appoint judges who will overturn Roe <i>without saying what your post-Roe world would look like</i>, well, for me and a lot of others that is simply a non-starter.</p>  

<p>I worry the Pro-Life Movement's absolutist positioning and tactics has the perverse effect of making the world <i>less</i> safe for my unborn twins.  When you add on top of that that I think the fight is futile and in many cases actively counter-productive even within the narrow confines of simply reducing the number of abortions that occur, and I hope you might understand my sense of frustration.</p> ]]>
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
